Thursday, June 15, 2017

Did Christ Preach in Hell Before His Resurrection? - I Peter 3.19

I asked the class tonight this question;"Where do we find this passage;
"(He) was crucified, died, and was buried.  He descended into hell.  The third day he arose for the dead."?  
I had several answers; "Corinthians."  "Psalms."  A third person gave a 3rd book.  Granted I used the word "passage."  But...the passages is not from the Bible.  It simply is not there.  It sounds Bible.  But is it?  No..it is not.  It is not from the Bible and it is not a biblical statement.  The passage is found in "The Apostles Creed," a man made document.
Please find below a copy of our lesson sheet AND a copy of my answer sheet so you can share this info with either a class you, your elders or your gospel preacher can present to the congregation where you attend.

Did Christ Preach in Hell on Saturday?


Archdale church of Christ / Russ McCullough – 14 June 2017
I Peter 3.19 Question


1.      Where do we find this statement; “(He) was crucified, died, and was buried.  He descended into hell.  The third day he arose from the dead.”?
2.      What was generally believed by people in Catholic Europe during the middle ages? 
3.      This L____________ dates back to the _______ century based upon a book known as P____________ Augustine who allegedly says in a sermon that the A___________ C___________ was given by the “inspiration of the Holy Spirit” to each of the 12 A_____________ who each wrote a 1/12 of the creed.  Augustine uses as a S_________ that this was asserted by St. A_____________ in the ________ century. 
4.      The CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA cites at least ________ versions of the creed.  There are 3 versions of the Old R_____________ Creed as supposedly quoted by Tertullian as well as _______ more “modern” versions.
5.      “What saith the Scriptures?”
6.      The traditional interpretation of I Peter 3.19 is that while in the tomb on S_______________ Christ went to H________ and preached to the OT S_________ so as to set them F_________.  This is generally held to be true by C_____________, most P_____________ and most members of the L_______ C__________ as well.
7.      This traditional approach is based on 2 passages: I Peter 3.18 – 20 & I Peter 4.4 – 6.
8.      There are two            questions we must ask of these texts: 1) Where does it say in the text that Christ went to hell?  2) “IF” He did, where does it say in the text that He went to Hell while in the Tomb?
9.      The context for I Peter 3.18 – 20 spans vs.13 – 21.  The focus of the overall text is not H_________, not those who are D_____________ but instead it is about B____________.  The portion of the text regarding the “spirits in prison” is A__________ and not P______________.
10.  The key to this auxiliary portion is found in vs. 3 as well as in vs. 1.10 – 11.
11.  Conclusion: Christ did not go to H__________ on S_____________.  He did not literally preach to anyone while in H_________ so that they might have a 2nd C___________.  He did C_________________ to the dead but did so while they were A__________ by the same Spirit that raised Him from the D___________, a Spirit that was, is, and shall be O_________________.  We cannot interpret Scripture by way of medieval C______________ creeds and D_____________.

Public Domain Image Courtesy of Wikipdia.org

1.      Where do we find this statement; “(He) was crucified, died, and was buried.  He descended into hell.  The third day he arose from the dead.”?
2.      What was generally believed by people in Catholic Europe during the middle ages? 
3.      This LEGEND dates back to the SIXTH century based upon a book known as PSEUDO Augustine who allegedly says in a sermon that the APOSTLES CREED was given by the “inspiration of the Holy Spirit” to each of the 12 APOSTLES who each wrote a 1/12 of the creed.  Augustine uses as a SERMON that this was asserted by St. AMBROSE in the FOURTH century. 
4.      The CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA cites at least FIVE versions of the creed.  There are 3 versions of the Old ROMAN Creed as supposedly quoted by Tertullian as well as TWO more “modern” versions.
5.      “What saith the Scriptures?”
6.      The traditional interpretation of I Peter 3.19 is that while in the tomb on SATURDAY Christ went to HELL and preached to the OT SAINTS so as to set them FREE.  This is generally held to be true by CATHOLICS, most PROTESTANTS, and most members of the LORD’S CHURCH   as well.
7.      This traditional approach is based on 2 passages: I Peter 3.18 – 20 & I Peter 4.4 – 6.
8.      There are two questions we must ask of these texts: 1) Where does it say in the text that Christ went to hell?  2) “IF” He did, where does it say in the text that He went to Hell while in the Tomb?
9.      The context for I Peter 3.18 – 20 spans vs.13 – 21.  The focus of the overall text is not HELL, not those who are DEAD but instead it is about BAPTISM.  The portion of the text regarding the “spirits in prison” is AUXILLARY and not PRIMARY.
10.  The key to this auxiliary portion is found in vs. 3 as well as in vs. 1.10 – 11.
11.  Conclusion: Christ did not go to HELL on SATURDAY.  He did not literally preach to anyone while in HELL so that they might have a 2nd  CHANCE.  He did COMMUNICATE to the dead but did so while they were ALIVE by the same Spirit that raised Him from the DEAD, a Spirit that was, is, and shall be  OMNIPRESENT.  We cannot interpret Scripture by way of medieval CATHOLIC creeds and DOGMAS .


Public Domain Image Courtesy of Wikipdia.org

Sources Consulted:

Primary: 
     I Peter 3, 4 - ESV (English Standard Version)
Secondary:
     THE CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA via wikipedia.org
     Piper, John ("Did Jesus Spend Saturday in Hell?" in the blog; DESIRING GOD, March 22,          2008

Sunday, June 11, 2017

My Name is John and I'd Like You to Meet My Friend Jesus


NOTE: I began today to preach through the Gospel of John every 2nd Lord's Day of each month.  The Series is entitled; "What A Friend We Have In Jesus!"  I am preaching in the 1st person as if I am John himself.  I will, Lord willing, not take any theological license in these presentations.

Good morning!  Welcome to the Ephesus church of Christ.  My name is John and I want you to know my friend Jesus.  As we stand before you I am 95 years old and thank God for the opportunity to serve this congregation as one of your elders.  In these series of sermons I want to recall my time with Jesus Christ of Nazareth who was...AND IS... my friend.  I want Him to be your friend too!

To Be Completed...

Wednesday, May 31, 2017

Dry Salvation? - Baptism Cannot be Eisegetically Interpreted

We became alarmed in 2006 when the ""emergent"  among us began to depart from the truth in regards to the instrument.(1)  That, however, was not the end but the beginning of apostasy.  That same "silence" argument has now been (mis)applied by many to reject the necessity of baptism as commanded by both Christ and His apostles. 

In today's LinkedIn feed (05.30.17), Joe Becker, the preacher for the Steamboat Springs church of Christ in Colorado Springs, CO posted this:

"One of the difficulties with the question, "Is baptism necessary for salvation?" is that the question--as it is generally presented--assumes that one's salvation can be pinpointed to specific moment in time. But that is not the picture of salvation presented to us in the New Testament. According to the Bible, salvation is made up of two major components--justification and sanctification. In justification, we receive imputed righteousness; in sanctification, we are made actually righteous. Those who have been justified are identified, in the New Testament, both as the, "saved," and as the, "being saved." Justification is granted on the basis of faith alone, but justification cannot complete one's salvation. Sanctification is required, and sanctification is a life-long process, which is inaugurated upon justification, but will not be consummated until the Last Day. We have been justified, and we are being sanctified, and the two, together, make up salvation."

Many have falsely argued that the use of the instrument is "not a heaven and hell issue" and is a matter of
choice, convenience, and tradition.  The argument begs the question, of course.  Any Bible believing Christian MUST CERTAINLY reject this allegorical eisegesis application to BAPTISM.  One is saved not by water, but in water where the "powerful working of God" is applied (2) as one is buried "into His death" (3) where the blood of Christ is contacted "for remission of sins." (4)  Justification and sanctification are not possible unless one is "in Christ."  The only way to get "into Christ" is to be baptized into Him. (5)  God's salvational work is applied at no other time or place.

In our time when the internet connects us all continuously, potential falsehood travels to every congregation faster than the speed of light.  Everyone, especially the elders, must be constantly aware of these matters so as to "convict the gainsayer." (6)  No straw man here, there is a real wolf always at Jude's metaphorical "side door" walking right in and sitting next to us.  Water is in God's Plan, Satan wants us all to stay dry as fodder for eternal fire. 

(1) For more the most detailed info available information on the so-called "emerging church" movement among churches of Christ, obtain a copy of: EMERGING TOWARDS APOSTASY.  The book is available through P & D Sales of Rock Hill, SC.  Their number is 803.817.1869.
(2) Colossians 2.11 - 12
(3) Romans 6.1 - 6
(4) Matthew 26.28; Acts 2.38
(5) Galatians 3.27
(6) Titus 1.9
Photo Courtesy of Wikipedia Commons

Sunday, May 28, 2017

Error - Self Severance From the Truth

An exposition of Mark 12.18 - 27 examining the deadliness of error.  Preached by Russ McCullough on 28 May 2017 at the Archdale church of Christ in Charlotte, NC.  Questions and comments can be posted through LinkedIn or by writing to: russellspeaksandwrites@gmail.com.

Sunday, May 14, 2017

Sarah - The Personification of Faith

14 May 2017 - Archdale church of Christ - Charlotte, NC - Russell H. McCullough


No outline this week.  I am recovering from bronchitis and all I could do is get up and get down without coughing as God gave me the strength.

Sunday, May 7, 2017

Rendering to God by Rendering to Caesar



“Rendering to God by Rendering to Caesar”

“From Ulster Plantation to the Carolina’s with the Gospel!” *

Russell H. McCullough / Archdale church of Christ, 2525 Archdale Drive, Charlotte, NC 28210
www.archdale.org / gospelcall.blogspot.com - Date:  7 May 2017

Text: Mark 12.13 - 17
Thesis:  When We Honor Caesar, We Honor God.  When We Pay Our Taxes, We Honor Caesar Which in Turn Honors God.  We Cannot Play Word Games With God!

1           Introduction

A.    The greater context begins in 11.27 – “…they came again to Jerusalem; and as He was walking in the Temple there came to Him the Chief Priests, and the Scribes, and the Elders…”

1.      The Levites
2.    The Levitical Lawyers
3.     Representatives from The Sanhedrin – The 70 elders of Israel made up of both Pharisees and Sadducees.
B.   “By what authority?” – “Was the baptism of John from God or from men?” – 11.27 – 11.33
C.    The parable of the vineyard – 12.1 – 12.12
D.   Having humiliated these, they (L, LL, S) sent the most unlikely of allies to “catch Him in His words,” the Pharisees and the Herodian’s!
1.      Pharisees – Ultra nationalists who continuously fought against Roman occupation and the influence of Greek culture.
2.    Herodian’s – Pro Roman collaborators, the otherwise enemies of the Pharisees.
3.     Only their common hatred of the Christ brought them together for the very first and very last time!
E.    These delegations singular purpose was to “catch Him in His words,” to “entangle Him in His talk,” and to “take hold of His Words” so they might build a case for His murder.
1.      They proposed to put Christ into a “semantic stew” as it were.
F.    They proposed to do this by a classic “catch 22” move, no matter what His response, He would convict Himself, a classic “between a rock and a hard place” rhetorical trick.  We might call this a “loaded question.”
1.      The Pharisee’s wanted to hear “YES” as this would politicize Christ as pro-Roman and destroy His standing with the people.
2.    The Herodian’s wanted to hear “NO” as this would politicize Christ as anti-Roman and make Him an enemy of the state.
3.     Either way, they thought, Jesus would incriminate Himself and they then could arrest Him.
G.   What they did not know was that they were attacking the King of Rhetoric! 
1.      Jesus Christ is the greatest Rhetorical Power the world has ever seen or will see!
a.    Jesus Christ defeats ALL arguments against Him!
b.    If one wishes to master rhetoric, if one wishes to master argumentation, if one wishes to master debate…study Jesus Christ!
H.   What Jesus Christ is about to do here is to pull a “rhetorical reverse” …it will put the delegation in the vice that they themselves created!
I.       This account is found in 3 of the synoptic gospels: Out Markian text today, in Matthew 22.15 – 22 and Luke 20.20 - 26

2          Mark’s and Matthew’s account are vertically identical:

A.   Pharisees and Herodian’s
B.   “Trap / entangle” Him in His talk
C.    He is called Teacher
D.   “We know You are True”
E.    “You don’t care for other’s opinions”
F.    “You are not swayed by appearances”
G.   “You truly teach the Way of God”
H.   They ask the same question; “Is it lawful to pay taxes to Caesar?”
I.       Jesus asks the question; “Why test Me?”
J.     Jesus asks for a coin
K.   “Whose likeness and inscription is here?”
L.    Same response; “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesars’s, and to God the things that are God’s.”
M.The same result; “And they marveled at Him.”

3          In Luke’s account, (Read Luke 20.20 – 26) we discover a wide variety of additional facts:

A.   Luke calls the delegation “spies.”
B.   He says the delegation “pretended to be sincere.”
C.    Their purpose was to deliver up Christ to the authority and jurisdiction of the governor.
D.    They were unable to do so in the presence of the people to catch Him in what He said.
E.    They became silent.

4         Motives, Questions, and Answers:

5          CONCLUSION:


6         The Meaning of the Text in It’s Theological, Historical & Cultural Context:

A.

7          The Challenge of the Text for Christians Today

A.    

8         “The Gospel Call”


·         My fifth great uncle was Hugh Gaston who was rector at the Ballywillan Presbyterian Church (pictured above left) in County Antrim, Ulster Plantation (Northern Ireland) and wrote the most dangerous book of his time; Gaston’s Collections.  It allowed “the ploughman to know more Bible than his clergyman.”  Hugh fled to South Carolina where he died prematurely of the measles.  He is buried just one hour south of Charlotte in Chester County, S.C. in “Burnt Meeting House Cemetery.”   Uncle Hugh continues to inspire my ministry to this very day.  You can read more about Uncle Hugh here: http://www.ballywillanpci.org/rev-hugh-gaston
Ruins photo courtesy of: ballywillanpci.org.



Thy Kingdom Come - The Truth About the Rapture - The Introduction

Thy Kingdom Come The Truth About the Rapture Based Upon the Study Guide of the Same Title by: David R Pharr Lesson #1 – I...